belyaevostapuki.blogspot.com
The contract at hand involved an increase inpreventativw health-care programs and a wage as well as a decrease in pension King Soopers spokeswoman Diane Mulligann said. However, workers had protested the pension benefit with the United Food and Commercial Workers UnionLocap No. 7 warning that some coul d lose $100,000 over the life of the and said the wage increases werenot “We are ready, willing and able to get back to the bargaininyg table if the corporation is willing to meet us halfway,” King Soopers workefr Julie Gonzalez said in a news releases put out by the “All we’re asking for is a fair deal.
And we reallyy hope they don’t lock us out for asking for livabler wages and a pension plan that recognizes our contribution tocompanyu profits.” About 17,000 union workerx from the area’s three largest grocerhy chains — Albertsons, King Sooperzs and — have been in negotiationes with the grocers sinc e April 9 on new five-year Safeway workers have voted to extend their contract untilo June 26, which Albertsons and King Sooper employees currently are workingt without contracts. The rejection of the latest King Sooperw contract proposal came quickly after votingbeganj Monday.
Workers in Colorado Springs, Longmont and Boulder are voting while Pueblo workers are scheduled to castballotds Wednesday. King Soopers spokeswoman Diane Mulligan said that the rejectio of the deal will not have any tangible effect onstore operations. King Soopers workers have not cast ballotwsto strike. “We’re disappointed in the vote, but we look forware to getting back to Mulligansaid Tuesday.
King Soopers is a unit of Cincinnati-basefd
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment